Cameron Slams AI Actors 💀
James Cameron is lowkey freaking out about AI replacing actors, no cap
So, James Cameron just gave an interview and I’m dead
The Tea ☕
They really said ‘hold my coffee’ and expressed how ‘horrifying’ it is to think about Gen AI replacing actors (yes, really). I mean, the man is on the board of Stability AI, so you’d think he’d be all about that AI life, but I guess not when it comes to stealing actors’ jobs.
He’s all about using AI in filmmaking, but only if it’s to make human creation more ‘sacred’ (okay, James, that’s deep). The people who actually know things are saying this tech will raise the bar for human-made art, and honestly, that’s a bit of a flex.
Why This Matters (Or Doesn’t) 👀
This is lowkey a whole thing and I’m not okay - the idea that AI could replace actors is wild, but also, let’s be real, it’s giving me ‘rent free’ vibes. Like, can AI really replace the charm of a human actor?
I’m skeptical, but also, I’ve seen some crazy AI-generated content, so maybe I’m just delulu.
On the other hand, if AI can make human creation more ‘sacred’, then I’m all for it (no cap). It’s like, the more tech we have, the more we’ll appreciate the real thing, right?
The Vibe Check 💅
All in all, James Cameron is out here looking like the main character, trying to protect the actors’ jobs, and I’m living for it. The vibe I’m getting is that AI is about to change the game, but not in a way that’s going to make human actors obsolete (fr fr).
It’s going to be a wild ride, but hey, at least we’ll have some good content out of it, and that’s all that matters, right?
So, what’s the tea, folks? Are you team AI or team human?
Daily briefing
Get the next useful briefing
If this story was worth your time, the next one should be too. Get the daily briefing in one clean email.
Reader reaction